•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop and validate brief measures of state (CUHI-S-SF) and trait (CUHI-T-SF) happiness derived from the Chulalongkorn University Happiness Inventory and to examine differences in happiness and psychological distress across work arrangements among Thai working adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey collected data from 452 participants using convenience sampling. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with Sample I (n ¼ 250; Mage ¼ 33.04) to examine internal structure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis with Sample II (n ¼ 202; Mage ¼ 35.29). Independent-samples t tests compared on-site and non—on-site workers on happiness and psychological distress.

Results: EFA supported a five-item unidimensional structure for the CUHI-S-SF and a nine-item three-factor structure (Positive Thinking, Gratitude, Pessimism) for the CUHI-T-SF, explaining 68% and 71% of the variance. CFA demonstrated good model fit, with all factor loadings >0.50 and Cronbach's α values of 0.84 (CUHI-S-SF) and 0.83 (CUHI-SSF). Convergent validity was supported by positive correlations with happiness and well-being, all p < 0.001. Both short forms correlated strongly with their full versions (r ¼ 0.89—0.92). Group comparisons showed no significant differences in state happiness, stress, anxiety, or depression, but on-site workers reported significantly higher trait happiness, t(200) ¼ 3.53, p < 0.001, d ¼ ¡0.51.

Conclusion: The CUHI-S-SF and CUHI-T-SF demonstrate good psychometric properties and serve as efficient tools for assessing happiness among Thai working adults. Findings indicate that only trait happiness varies across work arrangements.

Keywords: Happiness scale, Psychometric validation, State happiness, Trait happiness, Work arrangement

References

[1] Jebb AT, Morrison M, Tay L, Diener E. Subjective wellbeing around the world: trends and predictors across the life span. Psychol Sci 2020;31(3):293—305. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0956797619898826.

[2] Veenhoven R. The concept of happiness. In: Veenhoven R, editor. Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1984. p. 12—38.

[3] Hart EAC, Lakerveld J, McKee M, Oppert JM, Rutter H, Charreire H, et al. Contextual correlates of happiness in European adults. PLoS One 2018;13(1):e0190387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190387.

[4] Veenhoven R. The four qualities of life. J Happiness Stud 2000;1(1):1—39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010072010360.

[5] Medvedev ON, Landhuis CE. Exploring constructs of wellbeing, happiness and quality of life. PeerJ 2018;6:e4903. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4903.

[6] Veenhoven R. Is happiness a trait? Soc Indic Res 1994;32(2): 101—60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078732.

[7] Iamsupasit S, Suttiwan P, Watakakosol R, Tuicomepee A, Laopoonpat C. CU happiness inventory manual. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2012.

[8] Veenhoven R. Healthy happiness: Effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. J Happiness Stud 2008;9(3):449—69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9042-1.

[9] Fang Y, Veenhoven R, Burger MJ. Happiness and productivity: a research synthesis using an online findings archive. Manag Rev Q 2026;76(1):691—728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00492-x.

[10] Sharma N, Agrawal S, Veenhoven R. Does happiness foster social bonds? A research synthesis using an online finding archive. J Happiness Stud 2025;26(3):43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00747-6.

[11] Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas RE. Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annu Rev Psychol 2003;54:403—25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.

[12] World Health Organization [WHO]. Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases [updated 2019 May 28; cited 2026 Jan 21]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burnout-an-occupational-phenomenon-internationalclassification-of-diseases.

[13] Moran MR, Heller O, Chun Y, Shlomo Y, GrinsteinWeiss M. Examining associations between remote work and anxiety and depression: a longitudinal survey study in Israel. BMJ Public Health 2023;1(1):e000133. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000133.

[14] Dávila Morán RC. Influence of remote work on the work stress of workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Sustainability 2023;15(16):12489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612489.

[15] Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 2005;10:7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868.

[16] Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. eighth ed. Andover, Hampshire: Cengage; 2019.

[17] Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. fifth ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2023.

[18] Hills P, Argyle M. The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological wellbeing. Pers Individ Differ 2002;33(7):1073—82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6.

[19] Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67(6):1063—78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063.

[20] Briggs SR, Cheek JM. The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J Pers 1986;54(1):106—48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x.

[21] Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. second ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1996.

[22] Spielberger CD. State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Palo Alto: Mind Garden; 1983.

[23] Thapinta D. Reduction of anxiety of staff nurses working with AIDS patient through cognitive reconstructing and mindfulness training. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 1991.

[24] Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 180 JOURNAL OF HEALTH RESEARCH 2026;40(1):172—181 ORIGINAL STUDY 16(9):606—13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.16009606.x.

[25] R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [cited 2026 Jan 21]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org.

[26] Revelle W. psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research [cited 2026 Jan 21]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych.

[27] Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 2012;48(2):1—36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.

[28] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 1981;18(1):39—50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.

[29] Awang Z. Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. Shah Alam: UiTM Press; 2012.

[30] Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming. second ed. New York: Routledge; 2012.

[31] Kalkbrenner MT. Alpha, omega, and H internal consistency reliability estimates: reviewing these options and when to use them. Couns Outcome Res Eval 2023;14(1):77—88. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2021.1940118.

[32] Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. eighth ed. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth; 2014.

[33] Laurent É, Bague K, Vegas C, Dartevelle J. Enacting happiness from emotions and moods. In: Irtelli F, Gabrielli F, editors. Happiness and wellness - biopsychosocial and anthropological perspectives. London: IntechOpen; 2022. p. 147—79.

[34] Argyle M. The psychology of happiness. second ed. London: Routledge; 2001.

[35] Peterson RA. A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. J Consum Res 1994;21(2):381—91. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405.

[36] Dancey CP, Reidy J. Correlational analysis: Pearson's r. In: Dancey CP, Reidy J, editors. Statistics without maths for psychology. eighth ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2020. p. 175—216.

[37] Dodeen HM, Cody BL. Validating the Arabic scale of happiness among college students. Open Psychol J 2021; 14(1):46—52. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350102114010046.

[38] Arthaud-day ML, Rode JC, Mooney CH, Near JP. The subjective well-being construct: A test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Soc Indic Res 2005;74(3): 445—76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8209-6.

[39] Grigoriadou E, Kolias P, Theocharidou M, Gkioka M. Psychometric properties of the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire Short Form (OHQ-SF) in a Greek student sample. Discov Psychol 2024;4(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-024-00153-2.

[40] Liang N, Grayson SJ, Kussman MA, Mildner JN, Tamir DI. In-person and virtual social interactions improve well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput Hum Behav Rep 2024;15:100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100455.

[41] Lipert A, Musial K, Rasmus P. Working mode and physical activity as factors determining stress and sleep quality during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Poland. Life (Basel) 2021;12(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010028.

[42] Korkmaz U, Simsek MH, Sahin OF. The effect of emotion regulation difficulties and loneliness on anxiety, depression, and stress levels in remote workers. BMC Public Health 2025;25(1):2572. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23855-1.

[43] Leong WI, Wei L, Goodman MS, Pagan JA, Cuevas AG, Bather JR. Remote work and mental health among employed US adults. Occup Med (Lond) 2025;75(6):364—8. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaf050.

Download

Share

COinS