Development and Validation of the Thai Version of the Problematic Smartphone Use Scale for School-Age (PSU-SA) Children

Authors

Khanokporn Donjdee, Graduate Student with a Doctoral Degree in Applied Behavioral Science Research, Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.
Pichayanee Poonpol, Assistant Professor at the Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University.
Nootchanart Ruksee, Lecturer at the National Institute for Child and Family Development, Mahidol University.Follow

Abstract

Background: Problematic smartphone use affects public health. The COVID-19 pandemic changed children's lifestyles by increasing the frequency of smartphone use. This study aims to develop and validate the Thai version of the problematic smartphone use scale for school-age (PSU-SA) children.

Methods: We assessed the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the scale with item objective congruence (IOC) and Cronbach's alpha coefficient among 30 samples recruited by purposive sampling. We measured the quality of the scale among 550 participants selected from nine schools in Nakhon Pathom, Thailand using two-stage sampling. We administered the sociodemographic questionnaire and Thai versions of the PSU-SA questionnaires for participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to evaluate the construct validity.

Results: The IOC was 0.66e1.00, providing excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.926, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.844 to 0.959). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.887. The PSU-SA contained 25 items under five dimensions. Among the 550 participants, 48.5% were from females and 36.9% had a risk factor for problematic smart phone use. Results of the CFA assessing the quality of the PSU-SA included the following fit indices: ² = 505.24, df = 259, ²/df = 1.95, p < 0.001, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.93, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.91, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.042.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the reliability and construct validity of the PSU-SA scale for quantifying problematic smartphone use.

Keywords: Problematic smartphone use, School-age children, Measurement

Recommended Citation

Donjdee K, Poonpol P, Ruksee N. Development and Validation of the Thai Version of the Problematic Smartphone Use Scale for School-Age (PSU-SA) Children. J Health Res. 2024; 38(6):-. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940X.1107

References

[1] Ouyang M, Cai X, Yin Y, Zeng P, Chen Y, Wang X, et al. Student-student relationship and adolescent problematic smartphone use: The mediating role of materialism and the moderating role of narcissism. Child Youth Serv Rev 2020;110:104766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104766.

[2] Pivetta E, Harkin L, Billieux J, Kanjo E, Kuss DJ. Problematic smartphone use: An empirically validated model. Comput Hum Behav 2019;100:105-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.013.

[3] Sohn SY, Rees P, Wildridge B, Kalk NJ, Carter B. Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry. 2019; 19(1): 356. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2350-x. Erratum in. BMC Psychiatr 2021;21(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02986-2.

[4] Long J, Liu TQ, Liao YH, Qi C, He HY, Chen SB, et al. Prevalence and correlates of problematic smartphone use in a large random sample of Chinese undergraduates. BMC Psychiatr 2016;16(1):408. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1083-3.

[5] Thailand, National Statistical Office. The 2022 household survey on the use of information and communication technology (Quarter 1) [updated 2023 May 31; cited 2024 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/nso/survey_detail/jJ?set_lang=th.

[6] van Velthoven MH, Powell J, Powell G. Problematic smartphone use: Digital approaches to an emerging public health problem. Digit Health 2018;4:2055207618759167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618759167.

[7] Li C, Liu D, Dong Y. Self-Esteem and Problematic Smartphone Use Among Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model of Depression and Interpersonal Trust. Front Psychol 2019;10:2872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02872.

[8] Balta S, Jonason P, Denes A, Emirtekin E, Tosuntaş ŞB, Kircaburun K, et al. Dark personality traits and problematic smartphone use: The mediating role of fearful attachment. Pers Indiv Differ 2019;149:214-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.005.

[9] Rho MJ, Park J, Na E, Jeong JE, Kim JK, Kim DJ, et al. Types of problematic smartphone use based on psychiatric symptoms. Psychiatr Res 2019;275:46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.071.

[10] Billieux J, Maurage P, Lopez-Fernandez O, Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Can Disordered Mobile Phone Use Be Considered a Behavioral Addiction? An Update on Current Evidence and a Comprehensive Model for Future Research. Curr Addict Rep 2015;2(2):156-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y.

[11] Dou K, Wang LX, Li JB, Wang GD, Li YY, Huang YT. Mobile Phone Addiction and Risk-Taking Behavior among Chinese Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155472.

[12] Kim R, Lee KJ, Choi YJ. Mobile Phone Overuse Among Elementary School Students inKorea: Factors Associated With Mobile Phone Use as a BehaviorAddiction. J AddictNurs 2015; 26(2):81-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/jan.0000000000000074.

[13] Thai Health and RLG. Executive function brain development guide for 7-12-year-olds. Bangkok: Aksorn Samphan Press; 2018.

[14] Lee EJ, Kim HS. Effect of Maternal Factors on Problematic Smartphone Use among Elementary School Children. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179182.

[15] Kim D, Lee Y, Lee J, Nam JK, Chung Y. Development of Korean Smartphone addiction proneness scale for youth. PLoS One 2014;9(5):e97920. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097920.

[16] Csibi S, Griffiths MD, Demetrovics Z, Szabo A. Analysis of Problematic Smartphone Use Across Different Age Groups within the ‘Components Model of Addiction’. Int J Ment Health Addiction 2021;19(3):616-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00095-0.

[17] Csibi S, Griffiths MD, Cook B, Demetrovics Z, Szabo A. The Psychometric Properties of the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS). Int J Ment Health Addiction 2018;16(2):393-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9787-2.

[18] Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One 2013;8(12):e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558.

[19] Donaldson SI, Strong D, Zhu SH. A brief measure of problematic smartphone use among high school students: Psychometric assessment using item response theory. Comput Hum Behav Rep 2021;3:100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100091.

[20] Forster M, Rogers CJ, Sussman S, Watts J, Rahman T, Yu S, et al. Can adverse childhood experiences heighten risk for problematic internet and smartphone use? Findings from a college sample. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115978.

[21] Charoenwanit S, Soonthornchaiya R. Development of smartphone addiction scale: Thai Short Version (SAS-SVTH). J Mental Health Thailand 2019;27(1):25-36.

[22] Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997; 314(7080):572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572.

[23] Deng L, Chan W. Testing the difference between reliability coefficients alpha and omega. Educ Psychol Meas 2017;77(2):185-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416658325.

[24] Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15(2):155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

[25] Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. third ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2010.

[26] Hamamura T, Kobayashi N, Oka T, Kawashima I, Sakai Y, Tanaka SC, et al. Validity, reliability, and correlates of the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version among Japanese adults. BMC Psychol 2023;11(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01095-5.

[27] Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods 2016;48(3): 936-49. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.

[28] Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2022.

[29] Byrne BM. A primer of LISREL: basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989.

[30] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 1981;18(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.

[31] Agus M, Mascia ML, Bonfiglio NS, Penna MP. The Italian version of the mobile phone problematic use scale for adults (MPPUS): A validation study. Heliyon 2022;8(12):e12209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12209.

[32] El-Sayed Desouky D, Abu-Zaid H. Mobile phone use pattern and addiction in relation to depression and anxiety. East Mediterr Health J 2020;26(6):692-9. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.20.043.

[33] Lee EJ. Research trends related to problematic smartphone use among school-age children including parental factors: a text network analysis. Child Health Nurs Res 2023;29(2):128-36. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2023.29.2.128.

[34] Kwon M, Lee JY, Won WY, Park JW, Min JA, Hahn C, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLoS One 2013;8(2):e56936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056936.

[35] Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. seventh ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010.