Abstract
Background - Individual health behaviors are important for restraining the spread of influenza. It is crucial to explore what makes individuals take protective measures against infectious diseases. This study aimed to explore factors associated with the public’s intention to take protective measures during the influenza pandemic.
Method - This cross-sectional study was based on the 2013 Taiwan Social Change Survey, with a nationally representative sample. The health belief model constructs and public trust effects (government action, political support, and trust level) were examined using multivariable logistic regression. This study investigated the independent predictors of four personal preventive behaviors: wearing face masks, washing hands frequently, receiving an influenza vaccine, and keeping away from public places.
Results - 77% of the 2005 participants agreed to follow preventive measures. Multiple regression analysis showed that perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, trust level, living area, and marital status were significant predictors of behaviors. While using the four protective behaviors separately as dependent variables, the models showed that the trust level was the strongest driving factor for vaccination. Married people were more likely to avoid public places. Highly educated individuals were more willing to wear masks. Regular exercise also increased the frequency of hand washing during pandemics.
Conclusion - The findings confirm that health preventive factors can predict Taiwanese individuals’ intentions against influenza contagion, and considering public trust can increase the predictive capacity of health behavior.
Keywords: Health belief model, Influenza, Pandemic, Preventive behavior, Public trust
Recommended Citation
Shan-Ying L, Shu-Chuan YJ, Wei-Ning W.
Factors Furthering Public Compliance with Preventive Health Behavior in Taiwan.
J Health Res.
2023;
37(6):430-438.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940X.1046
References
[1] Esposito S, Principi N, Leung CC, Migliori GB. Universal use of face masks for success against COVID-19: evidence and implications for prevention policies. Eur Respir J 2020;55(6). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01260-2020.
[2] Sunjaya AP, Jenkins C. Rationale for universal face masks in public against COVID-19. Respirology 2020;25(7):678-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13834.
[3] Brienen NC, Timen A, Wallinga J, van Steenbergen JE, Teunis PF. The effect of mask use on the spread of influenza during a pandemic. Risk Anal 2010;30(8):1210-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01428.x.
[4] World Health Organization [WHO]. Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza: annex: report of systematic literature reviews. Geneva: WHO; 2019.
[5] Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 1984;11(1):1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101.
[6] Rosenstock IM. The Health Belief Model and Preventive Health Behavior. Health Educ Monogr 1974;2(4):354-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200405.
[7] Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q 1988; 15(2):175-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500203.
[8] Orji R, Vassileva J, Mandryk R. Towards an effective health interventions design: an extension of the health belief model. Online J Public Health Inform 2012;4(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v4i3.4321.
[9] Ahluwalia SC, Edelen MO, Qureshi N, Etchegaray JM. Trust in experts, not trust in national leadership, leads to greater uptake of recommended actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Risk Hazards Crisis Publ Pol 2021;12(3):283-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12219.
[10] Esaiasson P, Sohlberg J, Ghersetti M, Johansson B. How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: Evidence from ‘the Swedish experiment. Eur J Polit Res 2021;60(3):748-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12419.
[11] Hale T, Angrist N, Kira B, Goldszmidt R, Petherick A, Phillips T. Pandemic governance requires understanding socioeconomic variation in government and citizen responses to COVID-19 [updated 2020 Jun; cited 2022 Mar]. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3641927.
[12] van der Weerd W, Timmermans DR, Beaujean DJ, Oudhoff J, van Steenbergen JE. Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in The Netherlands. BMC Publ Health 2011;11:575. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-575.
[13] Wang CJ, Ng CY, Brook RH. Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing. JAMA 2020;323(14):1341-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3151.
[14] Schwartz J, Yen MY. Toward a collaborative model of pandemic preparedness and response: Taiwan's changing approach to pandemics. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2017;50(2):125-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2016.08.010.
[15] Fu YC. Taiwan Social Change survey (Round 6, Year 4): risk social. Taiwan: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica; 2013. p. 2016.
[16] World Health Organization [WHO]. Ten threats to global health in. 2019 [cited 2022 Mar]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-globalhealth-in-2019.
[17] Kraigsley AM, Moore KA, Bolster A, Peters M, Richardson D, Arpey M, et al. Barriers and activities to implementing or expanding influenza vaccination programs in low- and middle-income countries: A global survey. Vaccine 2021;39(25):3419-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.043.
[18] Zhang CQ, Chung PK, Liu JD, Chan DKC, Hagger MS, Hamilton K. Health Beliefs of Wearing Facemasks for Influenza A/H1N1 Prevention: A Qualitative Investigation of Hong Kong Older Adults. Asia Pac J Public Health 2019;31(3):246-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539519844082.
[19] Schmid P, Rauber D, Betsch C, Lidolt G, Denker ML. Barriers of influenza vaccination intention and behavior - A systematic review of influenza vaccine hesitancy, 2005 - 2016. PLoS One 2017;12(1):e0170550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170550.
[20] Blair RA, Morse BS, Tsai LL. Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia. Soc Sci Med 2017;172:89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.016.
[21] Ozawa S, Stack ML. Public trust and vaccine acceptance–international perspectives. Hum Vaccines Immunother 2013; 9(8):1774-8. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24961.
[22] Siegrist M, Zingg A. The role of public trust during pandemics: Implications for crisis communication. Eur Psychol 2014;19(1):23-32. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000169.
[23] Moucheraud C, Guo H, Macinko J. Trust in governments and health workers low globally, influencing attitudes toward health information, vaccines. Health Aff 2021;40(8):1215-24. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02006.
[24] Tang M, Huhe N. The variant effect of decentralization on trust in national and local governments in Asia. Polit Stud 2014;64(1):216-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12177.
[25] Han Z, Liu J, Wu WN. Trust and confidence in authorities, responsibility attribution, and natural hazards risk perception. Risk Hazards Crisis Publ Pol 2022;13(3):221-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12234.
[26] Kye B, Hwang SJ. Social trust in the midst of pandemic crisis: Implications from COVID-19 of South Korea. Res Soc Stratif Mobil 2020;68:100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100523.