Abstract
Background: The number of cancer survivors has increased drastically as a result of advances in early detection and treatment strategies. Nevertheless, many survivors in the cancer survivorship population face unique problems, risks, and needs. The study for this short report obtained qualitative data to assess barriers and facilitators to cancer care survivorship in urban and rural communities from a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Designated Cancer Center Catchment Area in the southeastern United States.
Methods: Thirty (n=30) community stakeholders participated in in-depth interviews. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded by independent raters. Inter-rater reliabilities indicated adequate agreement [inter-rater reliability (r)= 0.79].
Results: Themes related to community health concerns, cancer survivorship services, access to physical activity, and access to fresh fruits and vegetables were identified. In addition, participants provided strategies to improve the reach, utilization, and outcomes of postdiagnosis community-based care services.
Conclusion: Integrated community-engaged approaches are needed to address local survivorship services impacted by the social and structural determinants associated with unhealthy lifestyles.
Keywords: Cancer survivorship care, Care plan services, Community needs, Qualitative research, Social determinants of health, Structural determinants of health
Recommended Citation
Wright M, Brewer A, Wells M, Preston M, Thomson M, Sheppard V.
Community Recommendations for Enhanced Regional Survivorship Outcomes: A Case for Social and Structural Determinants of Health from a U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Designated Cancer Center.
J Health Res.
2023;
37(6):400-405.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940X.1038
References
[1] American Cancer Society [ACS]. Cancer treatment and survivor ship facts & figures 2019-2021. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2019.
[2] National Research Council [NRC]. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
[3] Henley SJ, Anderson RN, Thomas CC, Massetti GM, Peaker B, Richardson LC. Invasive cancer incidence, 2004-2013, and deaths, 2006-2015, in non-metropolitan and metropolitan counties-United States. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017;66(14):1-13. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6614a1.
[4] Swain CTV, Nguyen NH, Eagles T, Vallance JK, Boyle T, Lahart IM, et al. Post diagnosis sedentary behavior and health outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer 2020;126(4):861-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32578.
[5] Nekhlyudov L, Mollica MA, Jacobsen PB, Mayer DK, Shulman LN, Geiger AM. Developing a quality of cancer survivor ship care framework: implications for clinical care, research, and policy J Natl Cancer Inst 2019;111(11):1120-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz089.
[6] Santos A, Silva RPD, Almeida LM, Bosi MLM, Menezes MFB, Skaba M, et al. Cancer survivor ship needs in Brazil: patient and family perspective. PLoSOne 2020;15(10): e0239811. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239811.
[7] Loh KW, Ng T, Choo SP, Saw HM, Mahendran R, Tan C, et al. Cancer supportive and survivor ship care in Singapore: current challenges and future outlook. J Glob Oncol 2018;4: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00117.
[8] Foell A, Purnell JQ, Barth R, Witthaus M, Murphy-Watson T, Martinez S, et al. Resident-led neighborhood development to support health: identifying strategies using CBPR. Am J Community Psychol 2020;66(3-4):404-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12441.
[9] Fedorowicz M, Schilling J, Bramhal lE, Bieretz B,Su Y, Brown S. Lever aging the built environment for health equity. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2020.
[10] Okubo R, Wada S, Shimizu Y, Tsuji K, Hanai A, Imai K, et al. Expectations of and recommendations for a cancer survivor ship guideline in Japan: a literature review of guidelines for cancer survivorship. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2019;49(9):812-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyz070.
[11] Duangchan C, Steffen A, Matthews AK. Perspectives and practices regarding colorectal cancer survivor ship care: online survey results from oncology nurses in Thailand. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021;55:102048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102048.
[12] Champlain D, Gordan L. Survivor ship care throughout the cancer journey. Am J Manag Care 2018;24(10):SP438-9.
[13] Weaver KE, Nightingale CL, Lawrence JA, Talton J, Hauser S, Geiger AM. Preferences for breast cancer survivor ship care by rural/urban residence and age at diagnosis. Support Care Cancer 2020;28(8):3839-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05134-z.
[14] Brant JM, Silbermann M. Global perspectives on palliative care for cancer patients: not all countries are the same. Curr Oncol Rep 2021;23(5):60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01044-8.
[15] Duangchan C, Steffen A, Matthews AK. Thai oncology nurses' perspectives toward survivor ship care plan components and implementation for colorectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2022;30(5):4089-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06766-w.
[16] Morse JM, Field PA. Qualitative research methods for health professionals. Thousand Oaks: Sage;1995.
[17] National Cancer Institute. Community outreach and engagement: Virgina Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center [cited 2022 July]. Available from: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/sites/default/files/2022-06/coe_case_study_12.15.21_final_lc_krs_formatted_lc_kt_v3_508.pdf.
[18] Truant TLO, Lambert LK, Thorne S. Barriers to equity in cancer survivor ship care: perspectives of cancer survivors and system stakeholders. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2021;8: 23333936211006703. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211006703.
[19] Palmer NR, Avis NE, Fino NF, Tooze JA, Weaver KE. Rural cancer survivors ‘health information needs post-treatment. Patient Educ Counsel 2020;103(8):1606-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.02.034.
[20] Halpern MT, McCabe MS, Burg MA. The cancer survivor ship journey: models of care, disparities, barriers, and future directions. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016;35:231-9. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_156039.
[21] Cheng KKF, Lim YTE, Koh ZM, Tam WWS. Home-based multi dimensional survivor ship programmes for breast cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;8:CD011152. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011152.pub2.
[22] Price J, Brunet J. Feasibility and accept ability of a telehealth behavior change intervention for promoting physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption among rural-living young adult cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol 2021;39(6): 715-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2021.1896616.
[23] Pham Q, Hearn J, Gao B, Brown I, Hamilton RJ, Berlin A, et al. Virtual care models for cancer survivor ship. NPJ Digit Med 2020;3:113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00321-3.
[24] Chukmaitov A, Dahman B, Garland SL, Dow A, Parsons PL, Harris KA, et al. Addressing social risk factors in the inpatient setting: initial findings from a screening and referral pilot at an urban safety-net academic medical center in Virginia, USA. Prev Med Rep2022;29:101935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101935.
[25] Levit LA, Byatt L, Lyss AP, Paskett ED, Levit K, Kirkwood K, et al. Closing the rural cancer care gap: three institutional approaches. J CO Oncol Pract 2020;16(7):422-30. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00174.
[26] Blake KD, Ciolino HP, Croyle RT. Population health assessment in NCI-Designated cancer center catchment areas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019;28(3):428-30. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0811.
Included in
Community Health and Preventive Medicine Commons, Public Health Education and Promotion Commons