Abstract
Background: Accurate data are critical for public health surveillance yet can be challenging to ensure. The Tennessee (TN) HPV Vaccine IMPACT Project aims to assess the effectiveness of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in prevention of cervical cancer and high-grade dysplasia through laboratory reporting of pathology results among Davidson County women. This project assessed feasibility and value of use of administrative sources for improved data quality and completeness of high-grade cervical events in TN HPV-IMPACT between 2013-2017.
Method: We queried three administrative data systems (Hospital Discharge Data System, Ambulatory Surgical Treatment Center, and Tennessee Medicaid [TennCare]) for eligible women with cervical pre-cancer diagnostic and procedural codes from 2013 to 2017. We assessed data completeness from standard surveillance practices and from the addition of cases identified and verified through linkage with administrative data. Additionally, eligible women were linked to TennCare to inform missing demographic, insurance, and vaccination data elements.
Results: Overall, use of administrative data systems increased the number of women identified with cervical pre-cancer by 5% during the study years. Linkage to TennCare improved data completeness on race/ethnicity, insurance, and vaccination status by 10% to 20%.
Conclusion: Linkage with administrative databases is a feasible and effective method to improve public health data quality.
Keywords: audit, cervical dysplasia, HPV, data quality, public health, surveillance
Recommended Citation
Blankenship S, Pemmaraju M, Mitchel E, Markus TM, Griffin MR, Castilho J.
Administrative Data Improves Quality of Cervical Pre-cancer Surveillance in Davidson County, Tennessee, United States.
J Health Res.
2023;
37(3):139-144.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940X.1002
References
[1] Markowitz LE, Gee J, Chesson H, Stokley S. Ten years of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United States. Acad Pediatr 2018;18(2S):S3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.09.014.
[2] McClung NM, Gargano JW, Bennett NM, Niccolai LM, Abdullah N, Griffin MR, et al. Trends in human papillomavirus vaccine types 16 and 18 in cervical precancers, 2008-2014. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol 2019;28(3):602-9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0885.
[3] Flagg EW, Torrone EA, Weinstock H. Ecological association of human papillomavirus vaccination with cervical dysplasia prevalence in the United States, 2007-2014. Am J Publ Health 2016;106(12):2211-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303472.
[4] Gargano JW, Park IU, Griffin MR, Niccolai LM, Powell M, Bennett NM, et al. Trends in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer screening in 5 states, 2008-2015. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 2019;68(8):1282-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy707.
[5] Cadarette SM, Wong L. An introduction to health care administrative data. Can J Hosp Pharm 2015;68(3):232-7. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1457.
[6] HEDIS. NCQA. https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/. [Accessed 16 July 2021].
[7] McClung NM, Gargano JW, Park IU, Whitney E, Abdullah N, Ehlers S, et al. Estimated number of cases of high-grade cervical lesions diagnosed among women - United States, 2008 and 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68(15):337-43. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6815a1.
[8] Medicaid j Medicaid. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/index.html. [Accessed 30 August 2021].
[9] Special reports. https://www.tn.gov/health/health-programareas/statistics/special-reports.html. [Accessed 16 July 2021].
[10] TennCare Medicaid. https://www.tn.gov/tenncare/membersapplicants/eligibility/tenncare-medicaid.html. [Accessed 16 July 2021].
[11] Mao J, Etkin CD, Lewallen DG, Sedrakyan A. Creation and validation of linkage between orthopedic registry and administrative data using indirect identifiers. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(6):1076-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.063.e0.
[12] Harron K, Parslow R, Mok Q, Tibby SM, Wade A, Muller-Pebody B, et al. Monitoring quality of care through linkage of administrative data: national trends in bloodstream infection in U.K. PICUs 2003-2012. Crit Care Med 2015;43(5):1070-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000941.
[13] Shahian DM, Silverstein T, Lovett AF, Wolf RE, Normand SLT. Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Circulation 2007;115(12):1518-27. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.633008.
[14] Staat MA, Rice MA, Donauer S, Payne DC, Bresee JS, Mast TC, et al. Estimating the rotavirus hospitalization disease burden and trends, using capture-recapture methods. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;29(12):1083-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0b013e3181fb8f7b.
[15] Grijalva CG, Weinberg GA, BennettNM, Staat MA, Craig AS, Dupont WD, et al. Estimating the undetected burden of influenza hospitalizations in children. Epidemiol Infect 2007;135(6):951-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026880600762X.
[16] Haley VB, Van Antwerpen C, Tserenpuntsag B, Gase KA, Hazamy P, Doughty D, et al. Use of administrative data in efficient auditing of hospital-acquired surgical site infections, New York State 2009-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(6):565-71. https://doi.org/10.1086/665710.