•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Background: The rapid increase of Indonesian migrants to Thailand in the last two decades due to greater regional integration, transport connectivity, and internationalization of education. Different religion, socio-culture, and other sociodemographic factors might affect their adaptation to the Thai society.

Method: A mixed-method design was employed for data collection. The quantitative data were derived from an online survey of 268 respondents, while the qualitative data came from literature review, in-depth interviews, focus group discussion, and direct observation.

Results: Indonesian migrants tended to opt for an integration strategy and to a lesser extent a separation strategy, with assimilation and marginalization ranking lowest in the acculturation scale. Association test of socio-economic characteristics and acculturation strategies further showed conforming results with minimum variation. Qualitative findings broadly confirmed the overall preference for integration as the majority of Indonesian migrants, composed of students and professionals, is well-adapted to Thai society, despite religion and language differences. A minority composed of Indonesian housewives were more inclined toward separation when not engaged in entrepreneurial activities. Not surprisingly, the small number of Indonesian women in mixed marriages with a Thai national living in relatively isolated rural areas were more assimilated in Thai society. A counterintuitive association of assimilation and marginalization was further noted, which requires further research for a more complete explanation.

Conclusion: The dominant acculturation strategy of Indonesian migrants in Thailand is integration, followed by separation. Several sociodemographic factors, including education and occupation, influence these strategies.

Keywords: acculturation strategy; Indonesian migrants in Thailand; migration

References

[1] Tamagno E. Strengthening social protection for ASEAN migrant workers through social security agreements. Bangkok: ILO; 2008. [cited 2020 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—asia/—robangkok/ documents/publication/wcms_160332.pdf.

[2] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UN/DESA]. World economic situation and prospects 2016. New York: UN; 2016. [cited 2021 Mar 3]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wesp/ wesp_current/2016wesp_full_en.pdf.

[3] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UN/DESA]. World population prospects: the 2017 revision. [cited 2021 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.un.org/ development/desa/publications/world-populationprospects- the-2017-revision.html.

[4] National Statistical Office [NSO]. The 2010 population and housing census. [cited 2020 Mar 1]. Available from: http://web.nso.go.th/en/stat_theme_socpop.htm.

[5] Roy EV. Siamese melting pot: ethnic minorities in the making of Bangkok. Singapore: ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute; 2017.

[6] Hays J. Indonesia in World War II. [updated 2015 Jun; cited 2021 Feb 25]. Available from: http://factsanddetails.com/indonesia/History_and_Religion/sub6_1c/entry-3954.html.

[7] Schaefter D. The return of Indonesian exile writing: writing in exile during the new order (1965-1998) and its return after 1998. In: Proceedings of the SOAS/TUFS Postgraduate Symposium; 2006 February 20-21; London. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies; 2006.

[8] Aoki M. Thailand's migrant worker management policy as regional development strategy. In: Hatsukano N, editor. Rethinking migration governance in the Mekong region: from the perspective of the migrant workers and their employers. ERIA Research Project Report FY2017 no19. Jakarta: ERIA and IDE-JETRO; 2019. p. 175-99.

[9] Nasution Z. Acculturation of Indonesian migrants in Thailand. Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University; 2020.

[10] Skuza JA. Humanizing the understanding of the acculturation experience with phenomenology. Human Studies. 2007; 30(4):447-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9073-6.

[11] Naidoo L. Developing social inclusion through after-school homework tutoring: a study of African refugee students in Greater Western Sydney. Br J Sociol Educ. 2009;30(3):261-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690902812547.

[12] Berry JW, Trimble JE, Olmedo EL. Assessment of acculturation. In: Lonner WJ, Berry JW, editors. Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications; 1986. p. 291-324.

[13] Nwosu OC, Barnes SL. Where 'difference is the norm': exploring refugee student ethnic identity development, acculturation, and agency at shaw academy. J Refug Stud. 2014;27(3):434-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fet050.

[14] Riggs NR. After-school program attendance and the social development of rural Latino children of immigrant families. J Community Psychol. 2006;34(1):75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20084.

[15] Park RE. Race and culture. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press; 1950.

[16] Gordon MM. Assimilation in American life: the role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press; 1964.

[17] Warner TD, Fishbein DH, Krebs CP. The risk of assimilating? Alcohol use among immigrant and U.S.-born Mexican youth. Soc Sci Res. 2010;39(1):176-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.07.001.

[18] Berry JW, Phinney JS, Sam DL, Vedder P. Immigrant youth: acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Appl Psychol. 2006; 55(3):303-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00256.x.

[19] Stuart J, Ward C. A question of balance: exploring the acculturation, integration and adaptation of Muslim immigrant youth. Psychosocial Intervention. 2011;20(3):255-67. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2011v20n3a3.

[20] Ward C, Liu J, Fairbairn-Dunlop P, Henderson A. Youth voices, youth choices: Identity, integration and social cohesion in culturally diverse Aotearoa/New Zealand. Wellington: Centre for Applied Cross-cultural Research, Victoria University of Wellington; 2010.

[21] Berry JW. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Appl Psychol. 1997;46(1):5-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x.

[22] Ray B. Immigrant integration: building to opportunity. [updated 2002 Oct 1; cited 2020 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrantintegration-building-opportunity.

[23] Barry DT. Development of a new scale for measuring acculturation: the east Asian acculturation measure (EAAM). J Immigr Health. 2001;3(4):193-7. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012227611547.

[24] Chataway CJ, Berry JW. Acculturation experiences, appraisal, coping, and adaptation: a comparison of Hong Kong Chinese, French, and English students in Canada. Can J Behav Sci. 1989;21(3):295-309. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079820.

[25] Zheng X, Berry JW. Psychological adaptation of Chinese sojourners in Canada. Int J Psychol. 1991;26(4):451-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599108247134.

[26] Papadopoulos DK, Karasavvoglou A, Geranis C, Violitzi K. The Effect of socio-demographic variables on acculturation of Albanian immigrants in Greece. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;19:154-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00017-9.

[27] Lee JS. Acculturation Strategy, Acculturative Stress and Academic Performance in First-Year Chinese International Students at an American College. Massachusetts: Northeastern University; 2016.

[28] Sullivan C, Kashubeck-West S. The interplay of international students' acculturative stress, social support, and acculturation modes. Journal of International Students. 2015;5(1):1-11.

COinS