Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations (Chula ETD)

Other Title (Parallel Title in Other Language of ETD)

กลุ่มคำเรียงในบทภาพยนตร์ของภาพยนตร์กระแสหลักกับในบทภาพยนตร์ คัดสรรของโนอาห์ บาวม์บาค: การศึกษาวาทกรรมหนังและโทรทัศน์ตามแนวภาษาศาสตร์คลังข้อมูล

Year (A.D.)

2021

Document Type

Thesis

First Advisor

Raksangob Wijitsopon

Faculty/College

Graduate School (บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย)

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Degree Level

Master's Degree

Degree Discipline

English as an International Language

DOI

10.58837/CHULA.THE.2021.149

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate and compare language use in film scripts of American mainstream movies and in Noah Baumbach's, focusing on lexical bundles and their functional contributions to meanings and aesthetic values of the given texts. Two corpora were compiled as the datasets: Mainstream Film Corpus (MFC), which consists of 100 screenplays of top Hollywood blockbusters during 2005-2019, and Noah Baumbach Corpus (NBC), which contains five film scripts written by Noah Baumbach alone. Frequent four-word lexical bundles were extracted and approached qualitatively in terms of their functions, following Biber et al. (2004) and Biber (2006) as analytical frameworks. Results demonstrate that lexical bundles in MFC and those in NBC are similar in overall distributional patterns of lexical bundle types, with stance bundles topping the lists, followed by referential, special-function and discourse-organizing bundles, respectively. This is argued to reflect shared features of the film script as a register. However, a number of differences between the two corpora were also observed. Crucially, while lexical bundles in MFC highlight dialogue and narrative descriptions of scene, movement and body language in film scripts of mainstream movies, those in NBC feature dialogues, which serve purposes of characterization and character development in Noah Baumbach’s storylines. The study thereby contributes to the growing fields of telecinematic discourse and telecinematic stylistics. Limitations of the study and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.