•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Background: Delayed contact with emergency medical services (EMS; 1669 in Thailand) contributes to poor outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly among older adults with limited symptom recognition. This study evaluated the effects of an e-learning program on AMI-related knowledge, health beliefs, and decision-making among older adults in urban Thailand.

Methods: A one-group pretest–posttest design with follow-up was conducted from December 2025 to January 2026. Thirty-five older adults aged 60–85 years from urban communities in Bangkok and nearby provinces participated. The two-week e-learning intervention comprised four interactive lessons based on the Health Belief Model and American Heart Association recommendations. AMI knowledge, health beliefs, and decision-making were assessed at pretest, posttest, and follow-up using repeated-measures analyses.

Results: Knowledge of coronary artery disease risk factors (p < 0.05; η²ₚ = 0.213) and AMI symptoms (p < 0.001; η²ₚ = 0.357) increased significantly over time. Perceived self-regulation (p < 0.001; η²ₚ = 0.302) and cues to action (p < 0.05; η²ₚ = 0.110) also improved significantly. Perceived severity improved post-intervention but declined at follow-up. No significant changes occurred in perceived susceptibility, benefits, or barriers scores. Decision-making differed significantly across time, although no significant improvement was observed from baseline to either post-intervention or follow-up. The proportion intending to call EMS when encountering someone with an AMI increased from 68.6% at baseline to 88.6% immediately after intervention was completed, but this change was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The e-learning program improved AMI-related knowledge and selected health beliefs, but effects on decision-making were inconclusive. Future studies should use a randomized controlled trial with a larger and stronger scenario-based measures.

Keywords: E-learning, Older adults, Acute myocardial infarction, Health belief model, Health education

References

[1] Miller M, Di Cesare M, Rahimzadeh S, Perel P, Taylor S, Shrikhande S, et al. World heart report 2024. Geneva: World Heart Federation; 2024.

[2] Ministry of Public Health, Department of Disease Control. Coronary artery disease (CAD) situation in 2019. Nonthaburi: Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health; 2019.

[3] Banharak S, Prasankok C, Lach HW. Factors related to a delay in seeking treatment for acute myocardial infarction in older adults: An integrative review. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res Thail 2020;24(4):553—68.

[4] Hu DQ, Hao YC, Liu J, Yang N, Yang YQ, Sun ZQ, et al. Prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction in China: findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) project. J Geriatr Cardiol 2022;19(4):276—83. https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.04.005.

[5] Chommaungming P. Effectiveness of the Use of Warning Signs Card for Patients with the Risk of Developing Acute Myocardial infarction and Acute Ischemic Stroke to Access the Emergency Medical System, Bangrakam District, Phitsanulok Province. J Emerg Med Serv Thailand 2021;1(1):23—33. https://doi.org/10.14456/jemst.2021.3.

[6] Metprommarat A, Banharak S, Panpanit L, Chanaboon S, Sittipakorn S. The effects of a concerning older adult abilities health education program to promote appropriate decision among acute myocardial infarction patients. Sci Rep 2025;15(1):31600. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15354-5.

[7] Banharak S, Threeranut A, Metprommarat A. Effects of health education applying role play on decision making in acute myocardial infarction situation among older adults in community. Sci Rep 2024;14(1):19627. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70747-2.

[8] Buyl R, Beogo I, Fobelets M, Deletroz C, Van Landuyt P, Dequanter S, et al. e-Health interventions for healthy aging: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2020;9(1):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01385-8.

[9] Sanprakhon P, Chusri O, Wongwisadkul S. The effects of health belief application program in older adults with risk of coronary artery disease in a community. Nurs J Ministry Public Health 2018;28(3):87—100.

[10] Banharak S, Metprommarat A, Mahikul W, Jeamjitvibool T, Karaket A. Effectiveness of acute myocardial infarction interventions on selected outcomes among community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2023;13(1):18538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45695-y.

[11] Rosenstock IM. Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr 1974;2(4):328—35. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403.

[12] Becker MH. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior. Health Educ Monogr 1974;2:324—508. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200407.

[13] Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, Amsterdam E, Bhatt DL, Birtcher KK, et al. AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021;144(22):e368—454. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029.

[14] Arunpongpaisal S, Kongsuk T, Maneethorn N, Maneethorn B, Wannasawek K, Leejongpermpoon J, et al. Development and validity of two-question screening test for depressive disorders in Northeastern Thai community. Asian J Psychiatry 2009;2(4):149—52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2009.10.002.

[15] Kuha O, Kumniyom N, Thongnum N, Vidhyachak C, Nakawiro D, Srisuwan P. Appropriate Dementia Screening Tool for Thai Older Peoples. J Nurs Health Care 2021;39(4):26—34.

[16] Glass GV. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. Educ Res 1976;5(10):3—8. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174772.

[17] Shojaei S, Farhadloo R, Aein A, Vahedian M. Effects of the Health Belief Model (HBM)-Based Educational Program on the Nutritional Knowledge and Behaviors of CABG Patients. J Tehran Heart Cent 2016;11(4):181—6.

[18] Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth 2019;22(1):67—72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18.

[19] Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metabol 2012;10(2):486—9. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505.

[20] De Main AS, Xie B, Shiroma K, Yeh T, Davis N, Han X. Assessing the Effects of eHealth Tutorials on Older Adults’ eHealth Literacy. J Appl Gerontol 2022;41(7):1675—85. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221088281.

[21] Alyafei A, Easton-Carr R. The Health Belief Model of Behavior Change. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL). StatPearls Publishing; 2024 [cited 2026 Apr]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606120/.

[22] Diehl M, Wettstein M, Spuling SM, Wurm S. Age-related change in self-perceptions of aging: Longitudinal trajectories and predictors of change. Psychol Aging 2021;36(3):344—59. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000585.

[23] Roberts KL, Allen HA. Perception and Cognition in the Ageing Brain: A Brief Review of the Short- and Long-Term Links between Perceptual and Cognitive Decline. Front Aging Neurosci 2016;8:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00039.

[24] Ball BH, Peper P, Robison MK. Reminders eliminate age-related declines in prospective memory. Psychol Aging 2025;40(1):54—65. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000844.

[25] Nematzad P, Pourghane P, Besharati F, Gholami-Chaboki B. Effects of health belief model in promoting self-care behaviors among hypertensive older adults. J Educ Health Promot 2023;12:208. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_689_22.

[26] Abed ASA, Garcia-Valdes L, Taha H, Amezcua-Prieto C. Health belief model-based educational interventions for knowledge, beliefs, and intentions on mammography: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health 2026;26(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-04218-9.

[27] Sterner A, Holmberg B, Bremer A, Svensson A, Andersson H, Frank C. Decision-Making for Older Patients in Acute Prehospital Situations: A Scoping Review. Scand J Caring Sci 2025;39(4):e70148. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70148.

[28] Li S, Cui LY, Anderson C, Gao C, Yu C, Shan G, et al. Barriers from calling ambulance after recognizing stroke differed in adults younger or older than 75 years old in China. BMC Neurol 2019;19(1):283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1480-6.

[29] Khan S, Webster S, Puxty J, Robertson M. Key Challenges and Barriers to Digital Literacy for Older Adults: Scoping Review. JMIR Aging 2026;9:e80647. https://doi.org/10.2196/80647.

Share

COinS