Manusya, Journal of Humanities
Publication Date
2004-01-01
Abstract
It was formerly known and agreed generally that the earliest Southeast Asian people did not create their own civilization, but adopted models from India. Accordingly, civilization in Southeast Asia is called "Indianization". Yet, there are three mains schools of thought giving different views of the characteristics of Southeast Asian civilization. While the first school, led by Coedes, points out that civilization in Southeast Asia is not so different from its Indian models, the second school, led by Wolters, suggests that Southeast Asian civilization is completely different from the Indian one due to the process called 'localization'. Compromisingly, the last school, led by Mabbett, proposes the local societies. As the debates are still uncompromised, the article offers the deities in an attempt to compromise those debates. According to the observation on the case study, it can be summed up that Wolters and Mabbett's suggestions seem closer to the real situation, and that Southeast Asia its own typical civilization.
First Page
14
Last Page
31
Recommended Citation
Poungpattana, Rattanaporn
(2004)
"Reconceptualizing lndianization: A Study of the Art of the Local Female Deities,"
Manusya, Journal of Humanities: Vol. 7:
No.
2, Article 2.
Available at:
https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/manusya/vol7/iss2/2