Journal of Urban Culture Research
Publication Date
2026
Abstract
This article examines the issue of subjectivity and conformism in algorithmic cultural practices (robotic performances and neurocomputer installations “A3 K3 Dragan Ilic," “Alone Together," “NOOR” and “AIBO”). The focus is on the technological features of algorithmic creativity, which is based on machine learning, stylistic imitation and computational data processing. In this context, ethical and legal issues related to copyright and the recognition of artistic works created by artificial intelligence are analyzed. In particular, mechanized artistic practices create the illusion of autonomous creativity, whilst retaining the decisive role of human subjectivity in the organization and interpretation of cultural processes. Algorithmic creativity remains dependent on human programming, technological mediation and artistic conception. However, the creative process involving BCI may take on characteristics of subjectivity. This is evidenced by court rulings on the determination of subjectivity and copyright in works created through algorithmic computations.
DOI
10.14456/jucr.2026.7
First Page
113
Last Page
124
Recommended Citation
Sovhyra, Tetiana; Babushka, Larisa; Andrushchenko, Tetiana; Onischenko, Olena; and Brovko, Mykola
(2026)
"The Subjectivity and Conformity Issues in Contemporary Practices of Algorithmic Creativity,"
Journal of Urban Culture Research: Vol. 32, Article 8.
DOI: 10.14456/jucr.2026.7
Available at:
https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/jucr/vol32/iss1/8