Journal of Urban Culture Research
Publication Date
2021
Abstract
The bareness of the Chinese monumental landscape is the result of various factors, the analysis of which deserves an inquiry into Chinese modus vivendi. Daoist imprimatur and its recognition of nature’s superiority is but one. Buddhist sectarianism, Chinese fluid conception of time, Chinese iconoclasm, are phenomena that, largely, have concurred on creating a periodic tabula rasa of cultural heritage. Making sense of this is simply to recognize that artistic representations are not only metaphors for understanding social dynamics, but also a magnifying glass on the relation between people and their past.
DOI
10.14456/jucr.2021.2
First Page
20
Last Page
36
Recommended Citation
Castelli, Alberto
(2021)
"Chinese Paradox : Where are Chinese Monuments?,"
Journal of Urban Culture Research: Vol. 22, Article 3.
DOI: 10.14456/jucr.2021.2
Available at:
https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/jucr/vol22/iss1/3