•  
  •  
 

Chulalongkorn University Dental Journal

Publication Date

2013-05-01

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficiency of tongue-cleansing methods using a toothbrush, a tongue scraper or dental floss in reducing aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Materials and methods Tongue coat collected from 12 subjects by cleaning the tongue with a toothbrush, a tongue scraper, or dental floss were cultured to investigate type and number of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The ability to produce hydrogen sulfide gas of anaerobic bacteria was also investigated. The average numbers of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria colonies as well as the percentage of hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria obtained from each tongue cleansing method were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way ANOVA. Results The numbers of bacteria cultured from tooth-brushing and tongue-scraping methods were significantly greater than those from the dental floss (p < 0.05). While bacteria cultured from tooth-brushing and tongue-scraping methods were not significantly different. Conclusion Tongue-cleansing methods using a toothbrush and a tongue scraper were significantly more effective in reducing the amount of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria than dental floss.

DOI

10.58837/CHULA.CUDJ.36.2.2

First Page

75

Last Page

84

Included in

Dentistry Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.