•  
  •  
 

Chulalongkorn University Dental Journal

Publication Date

2008-05-01

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of different polishing instruments on the surface roughness of a nanofilled resin composite. Materials and methods Resin composite, Filtek Z350®, was condensed in an 5x4x2 mm3 block covered with a Mylar strip and then was polymerized with a curing unit for 40 seconds. One hundred and twenty specimens were randomly divided into six groups equally. The first group was a control. The others were polished with Sof-Lex® (3M), Enhance® (Dentsply), Pogo® (Dentsply), Composhape® (Intensiv) and Jet bur® (Kerr). The average surface roughness (Ra) was measured with a surface roughness tester after polishing. Surface roughness of a sample from each group was assessed using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA, at p < 0.05. Results The Sof-Lex® group demonstrated the smoothest surface which was not statistically different from the control group. However, surfaces polished with Pogo®, Enhance®, Composhape® and Jet bur® showed a statistically higher average surface roughness than the control group, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion Nanofilled resin composite displayed variable roughness depending on the polishing instruments used. Sof-Lex® gave the best polished surface.

DOI

10.58837/CHULA.CUDJ.31.2.9

First Page

213

Last Page

222

Included in

Dentistry Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.