•  
  •  
 

Chulalongkorn University Dental Journal

Publication Date

2006-01-01

Abstract

Objective To compare the biaxial flexural strengths of five current restorative resin composites which contain different types of filler and resin matrix. Materials and methods Five resin composites, namely Admira (Voco), CeramX (Dentsply), Filtek Supreme translucent (3M ESPE), Filtek Supreme standard (3M ESPE) and Z250 (3M ESPE), were used. Fifteen resin composite discs (13 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared for each product and stored in 37 °C distilled water prior to testing. The biaxial flexural tests were conducted using the universal testing machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm per minute. The statistical analysis used was one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD multiple comparison. Results Filtek Supreme translucent showed the highest biaxial flexural strength (167.3 MPa). The mean biaxial flexural strengths of Filtek Supreme standard and Z250 were 154.78 and 147.01 MPa, respectively. They were not significantly higher than CeramX. Conclusion Among the resin composites used in this study, resin composite with small filler particles showed higher biaxial flexural strength than those with larger filler particles. Resin composite with ormocer molecules did not show improved biaxial flexural strength.

DOI

10.58837/CHULA.CUDJ.29.1.1

First Page

1

Last Page

12

Included in

Dentistry Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.